Wednesday, March 29, 2017

Modi, Yogi and relay race

by Harish Gupta, National Editor, Lokmat Group


There is little doubt that the assembly election results in the mega-state of Uttar Pradesh, and the emergence of Yogi Adityanath as chief minister in its aftermath, has left the commentators spellbound! And that includes your faithfully. Two enigmas stand out to be resolved.

Tuesday, March 21, 2017

THE TALAQ HATRICK

by Harish Gupta, National Editor, Lokmat Group


With the courtroom battle for a seminal change in Muslim personal law—that of prohibiting the vile practice of giving divorce with the husband uttering the words ‘talaq’ thrice—now heading for climax, it is clear that the administration led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi has at last secured a bridgehead behind enemy lines. For the initiative to bring the matter of ‘triple talaq’, the nikahhalaal (compelling a divorced wife to consummate marriage with some other person and getting divorced by him before being allowed to remarry the first husband), and polygamy has come neither from politicians of any hue nor from the Islamic clergy and scholars. It has come from Muslim women, whose resentment against such misogynism in the name of religion was simmering over decades.

The practice of triple talaq, which is now being conveyed even through WhatsApp and text messages, is alleged by some of the leading Muslim women’s organization to be “un-Quranic”. Under the banner of Bharatiya Muslim MahilaAndolan (BMMA), an Indian Islamic feminist organisation and other bodies, signatures of over one million Muslim women were collected on a petition demanding abolition of triple talaq and nikahhalaal for being un-Islamic. Simultaneously, two women, Shayara Bano and Afreen Rahman, unilaterally divorced by their husbands, approached the Supreme Court with the same request.

The government has become a party as it strongly supports the Muslim women’s demand. “Lives of Muslim women cannot be allowed to be destroyed by triple talaq”, Modi announced at a pre-election rally in Bundelkhand last year. And now the Supreme Court has asked all sides to submit statements, including the government, the Muslim women’s organisations, as well as the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) that administers Muslim personal law and is opposed to any change in the existing system. March 30 is fixed as the date for the written submissions. A five-judge Constitution bench will decide issues relating to legal aspects of the practices of triple talaq, nikahhalalaand polygamy among Muslims but will not include in its ambit the overall question of divorce within the Muslim law. The bench, headed by Chief Justice of India JS Khehar, made it clear that it would not deal with the politically thorny issue of Uniform Civil Code, which is now under consideration of the Law Commission of India.

The AIMPLB, on its part, is invoking the divine Sharia laws on one hand and, on the other, drumming up support among opposition political parties for the issue of Muslim divorce to remain under its grips. It held rallies in Kolkata, where Trinamool Congress chief minister Mamata Banerjee, known for her vote-bank politics, sent two of her powerful ministers to be seen on the dais. More recently, during the ‘demonetisation’ furore, she reminded Modi that the difficulty that had been caused to ordinary people due to scrapping of 500 and 1,000-rupee notes would prompt them to “give BJP triple talaq”.

India’s 15 per cent Muslim voters have always been a foil for the BJP; hardly any prominent member of the community is known to support the party that has barely concealed contempt for the Constitution’s secular ideals and its supporters have been involved in communal riots. But the simmering discontent in the Muslim households on the triple talaq issue has given the BJP under Modi a foothold it never dreamt of. In Uttar Pradesh, the 19 per cent Muslim voters have voted in an unexpected way. In most of the state east of Allahabad, Muslim women have reportedly voted against the diktat of the mosque leaders to press the voting button in a tactical way so that the constituency’s winnable ‘secular’ (non-BJP) candidate—be it from SP or BSP—gets the vote. They have voted instead in accordance with their conscience, which has often turned poll strategists’ calculations on their head. On the other hand, in the riot-prone western Uttar Pradesh district of Muzaffarnagar, with 40 per cent Muslim population, the minority women have either voted for BSP, or have wasted their vote in some way or the other. In Muzaffarnagar, which witnessed horrible riots in 2013, the then ruling SP not only failed to resist the riot but sided with the clerics who were supporting triple talaq. Hence the Muslim women’s support for rival BSP. But what is more important is that they were unmoved by the prospect of the BJP winning by their refusal to obey the mosque’s instruction. In fact the BJP has won all the six assembly constituencies in the district.

For the BJP, it was a Trafalgar moment. For the first time, the Muslim society seemed open to negotiations. It was so much different from the Rajiv Gandhi government in 1985, when it lacked the courage to give effect to the Supreme Court judgment on the Shah Bano case (giving proper alimony to divorced wife); instead it brought about a clearly illogical amendment to an existing law to leave the Muslim divorce norms as patriarchal as ever.

The difference between Rajiv Gandhi in 1985 and Narendra Modi in 2017 is not only the long span of 32 years that separate them. The years have brought about drastic changes in the Muslim mindset, with a new generation of lawyers, doctors, accountants and other professionals among women in the community now crying for attention as a class demanding gender equity. The BMMA is a prism onto it.

Will the male chauvinist AIMPLB give way? Much depends on how the Supreme Court frames its judgment. If the apex court focuses on triple talaq, it is unlikely that the legal opposition to it will hold. And its credit will go to Narendra Modi and emergence of a new BJP. 


Friday, March 17, 2017

'Luv and Kush' winning battles

by Harish Gupta, National Editor, Lokmat Group


Narendra Modi and Amit Shah, the inseparable duos from Modi’s years as Gujarat chief minister. Like Luv and Kush, the warrior brothers, their partnership is mainly forged on (electoral) battlegrounds. But it has matured over the decades, with their voyage from Sabarmati to Ganga. Just how much power they pack in their punch came to light, for the second time after the 2014 general election, along the entire upper stretch of the Ganga last week, with the BJP campaign steered by the duo. They captured 379 of the 473 seats in the two assemblies of Uttarakhand (70) and Uttar Pradesh (403). That’s more than half the land washed by the “sacred river”.

Like Luv and Kush, they have issues to settle. The fighter brothers of mythology longed to right the wrong done to their mother, Sita, by their father, Ram. Modi and Shah are on a mission to establish their BJP as the next national alternative, after crushing the earlier one, Congress, and squelching its single binding factor, the Gandhi dynasty. During the earlier NDA rule, BJP’s efforts to do it was half-hearted, at best, and the end of A.B.Vajpayee’s government in 2004 put the Congress and the dynasty again at the top for a whole decade. Before taking charge of the BJP’s 2014 combat, Modi had put Shah in charge of the party in UP, as the two could not fight separately indeed. They must draw their bow backwards at once and release the arrows together.

After the phenomenal victory in 2014, in which the Congress was humbled to only 44 seats in the Lok Sabha, Luv and Kush had to catch a breath as they faced reversal in the 2015 assembly election in Bihar. It’s not that Modi and Shah had run out of their magic. Modi’s oratory was grand as ever and Shah picked up candidates and party workers from caste groups with the alacrity of the pelican snatching a fish from the lake’s surface. But nothing worked as the opposition had buried their historic internal feuds to form a Chinese wall against BJP.

This time round, the Modi-Shah team was meticulous and lucky. They left nothing to chances and learnt from the humiliating defeat in Bihar. In Bihar, the BJP worked hard to woo the Yadavs thinking that they will be angry with Nitish Kumar being projected as Chief Ministerial candidate. In the process, it ignored the other OBCs in Bihar and the Congress-RJD-JD(U) alliance proved fatal. The Luv-Kush duo knew the consequences of BJP losing UP and left nothing to chances. The strategy was in place from April last year when an insignificant OBC leader Keshav Prasad Maurya was appointed as UP BJP Chief. Three months later in July several OBC first timers MPs from UP were inducted in the Modi Council of Ministers. The luck favoured Luv-Kush duo again when some behind the scenes efforts to form a Bihar-type Mahagathbandhan (umbrella alliance of anti-BJP parties) in Uttar Pradesh failed. Then came the generational conflict raging between Samajwadi Party founder Mulayam Singh Yadav and his son Akhilesh Yadav, Chief Minister. This left the carefully crafted alignment between OBC groups and Muslims all but defunct. Besides, Mayawati, supremo of BSP, the party of Dalits, carried such long and bitter record of enmity with Mulayam Yadav that a BSP-SP coalition was out of the question. 

This left Mayawati with her 11% Jatavs and truncated Muslims. Shah began to work on the non-Jatavs in a big way. Despite an alliance between Congress and SP in the state, hammered out between Akhilesh and Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi, the portly BJP chief tapped its backward constituents for lines of fissure. The Modi-Shah duo re-established the OBC link that BJP had lost with the political eclipse of former chief minister Kalyan Singh (he is now Rajasthan Governor). Shah ensured that Kalyan Singh’s grandson gets the Assembly ticket and any OBC leader worth a salt given primacy.

Shah’s long hunt for non-Yadav OBC and non-Jatav yielded a handpicked army that could bypass the caste silos that Congress, SP or BSP could occupy. Though community-wise voting behaviour reports are not available yet, there is little doubt that BJP could make deep inroads into non-Jatav Dalits and non-Yadav OBC groups. There was little hope, though, that Muslims would press the EVM button in favour of BJP. But Modi succeeded in created a ray of hope amongst the Muslim women by telling them that he would end the regressive Triple Talaq. Secondly, Modi’s campaign speeches remained refreshingly ‘development-oriented’ in the early phases of the seven-phase poll. But as polling moved eastward, Modi invoked his trademark divisive rhetoric while leaders like Yogi Adityanath did the rest to consolidate non-Muslim votes.

For Shah, revenge tasted best when served cold. His swagger, though muted, hit the jackpot as he said that in the first two stages of the poll, in which 125 seats were at stake, his party had won 115, against his own claim of 90 and rout predicted by the Opposition & the media. The BJP’s social engineering paid rich dividends in UP where BSP is routed, RLD wiped out and Congress decimated. The situation is so pitiable that Mayawati will be out of even Rajya Sabha in April 2018 when her term ends.


Though Congress has retained Punjab, a Sikh (non-Hindu) majority state. But the entire BJP leadership was praying for its win as it never wanted AAP to win the border state. The AAP’s rout in Goa has also gladdened the Duo’s hearts. In Manipur, inhabited by tribal people, it is facing extinction from the mainline states where Hindu identity can be political currency. Modi and Shah, the ‘Luv-Kush’ duo of BJP seems unstoppable in the 2019 general election.

Wednesday, March 15, 2017

Parlt panel to probe EVM tampering in Maha civil polls

by Harish Gupta, National Editor, Lokmat Group


Parlt panel to probe EVM tampering in Maha civil polls

Exclusive 

Complaints from Pune Nashik, Dhule

Harish Gupta
New Delhi, March 14

The Parliament's Standing committee of Home & Personnel has decided to look into the complaints of EVM tampering during Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Municipal Committee elections. It is pertinent to mention that earlier the Election Commission had dismissed the petition of Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) chief Mayawati's allegations of EVM tampering in recently held Assembly polls including Uttar Pradesh where Mayawati had made serious allegation of EVM tampering in the recently held Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Municipal Committee elections.

In an exclusive chat with Lokmat on Tuesday the chairman of Parliament's Standing Committee of Home Affairs, Anand Sharma said, "The committee has received compliants from various cities & districts of Maharashtra giving evidence of tampering of EVM machines."

When ask to elaborate, Sharma said, "We haveWe have received complaints from Pune, Nashik, Dhule and other places of EVM tampering. One candidate alleged that he and his 28 family members cast their votes in the Zila Parishad polls. But the EVM showed zero votes in his favour.” Sharma said that the committee is now seized o these complaints and information is being verified. The Election Commission officials are in touch with the Committee officials and we are going to look into it.”

The standing committee will also look into the Supreme Court order which had said that paper trail must be kept he said. Previously, Mayawati had dismissed the Uttar Pradesh assembly election results and called for fresh polls after BSP's crushing defeat. Mayawati also accused the BJP of murdering democracy saying, "Either the EVMs did not accept votes other than the BJP, or the votes of other parties have gone to BJP through these EVMs."

However the standing committee probing the EVM tampering allegations in itself is set to give a new dimension to the whole issue. The standing commission would also summon electronic engineers, suppliers and experts to look into the matter.



Wednesday, March 8, 2017

Why Priyanka Gandhi is out of action ?

by Harish Gupta, National Editor, Lokmat Group



Lokmat News Network

New Delhi, Feb 23:

Priyanka Gandhi who was considered as the prime architect of the Congress-SP alliance in UP and billed as a star campaigner, is suddenly out of action.

Barring the lone poll rally appearance last week in the family bastion of Rae Bareli, Priyanka Gandhi’s No-Show has set tongues wagging. The party workers and candidates in these two Lok Sabha constituencies and neighbouring areas were desperately looking for Priyanka Gandhi. But she was no where around.

Highly placed sources in the Gandhi family say that the reasons for Priyanka Gandhi’s absence from the poll scene are personal. While Congress president Sonia Gandhi has been out of action due to medical advice, Priyanka Gandhi has been forced to stay back in the Capital due to serious injury in the left eye of her son Rehan.

Presently admitted at Capital’s prestigious Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Rehan’s eye ailment has been a cause of serious worry for the entire family and virtually incapacitated her movement.


While the family sources confirmed the injury to Rehan’s eye when it was hit by a cricket ball. It transpires that Rehan was first taken to AIIMS and then to Hyderabad and now admitted at the Ganga Ram hospital.