by Harish Gupta, National Editor, Lokmat Group
Here is a random sample of the
Indian general elections and their acknowledged attributes.
1971—On Indira Gandhi’s Garibi
Hatao slogan.
1977—Against dictatorship.
1980 –Against Janata Party
mis-rule
1989—Against corruption.
1996—Fragmented polity &
Hindutva.
2004—Against NDA’s “non-inclusive”
growth model, encapsulated in its “India Shining” campaign.
Years roll by and so do issues.
Move a little forward from now, say a year, and look back at the elections in
the coming two months. What will posterity flag it as? As the one against
corruption? Well, yes and no. The recent upsurge of AAP mirrors the pent-up
rage in the people’s heart against graft at all levels—high and low, visible
and invisible, reported and gagged. However, the dramatic trajectory of AAP
raises another question, a very uncomfortable one, on whether a clean
government is something that can be achieved through street protests. AAP’s
short tenure in Delhi
was quite unnerving as a “trailer”. It could be different, perhaps, if AAP had
the magic key to a corruption-free India . But there is no evidence of
that yet.
But then what is the 2014 poll
about? What will be its defining attribute? Is it an election against
inflation? Hmm...I think many readers will buy this argument, particularly if
they are harassed housewives tired of haggling with the vegetable vendor who
asks for a higher price almost every week. But that too may look different if
you step back and view the big picture. The wholesale price inflation, which is
used in measuring inflation in India ,
has ruled generally high, being 7.7 per cent annually on an average between
1969 and 2013. It spiked the highest to 34.7 per cent in the 1976 “Emergency”
year. However, the law of averages being what it is, it is nobody’s argument
that the all-round price rise since last year hasn’t left the people enraged.
But it is a fact that the prices are stabilising, reaching 5.05 per cent
year-on-year in January. By April, inflation may be yesterday’s story.
This search for the defining character
of the ‘Super Vote’ should lead to a closer re-examination of the famous
elections of the past. Were they really decided on public issues? Or was it
because the caste and community alliances went just right for the winner (and
wrong for the loser)? For instance, if Muslims of North India and some OBCs
hadn’t voted with their feet against the Congress in 1977, it is doubtful if
the outcome of the election could be as epochal as it turned out to be. In 1989
the “Mandal” fuse had just sparked a chain reaction that continues even today.
It is therefore doubtful if Rajiv Gandhi was to be really routed for the Bofors
scandal, or it was due to caste groups moving away from under Congress
umbrella. Similarly, in 1996, post-Babri BJP could cause a substantial
across-the-castes consolidation of non-Muslim votes in its favour in most
northern states, notably UP. It left Mulayam Singh Yadav, a consummate player
of the OBC caste card, perplexed and anxious. He got himself squeezed into a
shell and refused to support BJP in 1996 just as he ditched Congress president
Sonia Gandhi two years later. Finally, in 2004, Atal Behari Vajpayee’s
government fell not because of the “India Shining” campaign, as Congress
president’s leftist advisors want to believe, but because some of BJP’s NDA
partners, Lok Janshakti Party leader Ram Vilas Paswan, for example, who are
active in terrains which have considerable Muslim population, abandoned NDA
like ship on fire after the 2002 Gujarat
riots. The NDA lost many other allies too in 2004 including the DMK, NC.
Elections are therefore not so
much about one or two ‘national issues’ sweeping across the electorate, as like
in a partner dance in which who will “follow” depends on who is “leading”. BJP
was unacceptable as leader in 2004. But, in its ten years in wilderness, it has
succeeded on several counts. Here are a few of them:
* Attracting Investment: Most regional political parties
in India
are languishing in the absence of big-ticket investments, putting on freeze
creation of regular employment. They look wistfully at Gujarat
under Modi, where most investment is focused;
* The Muslim Factor: Modi has regained the confidence
of those allies who deserted NDA in 2004 by ensuring not a single communal
flare-up in the twelve long years since 2002. At least, it sells in adversity;
·* Caste Card: BJP is playing the caste card
down to a T this time round. The Dalits have switched between Congress and the
caste-based parties. But now the Dalit universe has got fragmented. In Maharashtra , RPI leader Ramdas Athawale Sena leader
Uddhav Thackeray and BJP leader Gopinath Munde are known by the meaningful
acronym ATM. In UP, Udit Raj, Vaiko of MDMK and Anbumani Ramadoss’
PMK—representing the lowermost segment of the Dalit communities—got DMK chief
M. Karunanidhi expectedly reaching for the panic button. He immediately
remembered that Modi is his long lost “friend” and a “hard working” person. The
DMDK is getting ready to seal the alliance too.
Modi realised too early in the day
that without partners, it will be like “hanooz dilli dooreste (Delhi is still far away.) As the General
Elections are being announced, India ’s huge cauldron of castes and
communities have begun to simmer. The fortunes of parties have changed mid-way
many a times in the past - be it 1991 when Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination
in midst of polling, brought the party back to power. It turned again in 1999,
thanks to the Kargil war. Congress can still hope to undo some of the damage by
sewing up alliances and getting BSP supremo Mayawati, perhaps the most powerful
Dalit leader, on its side. Though she hasn’t been able to retain her Muslim
support, it is undeniable that she holds a large part of the Dalit community of
north India
in her thrall. Nor do they question Behenji’s command. Deserted by
allies and disliked by the middle class, Congress can still turn the outcome if
it gets its pre-poll alliances and issues right. May be, an Elephant ride is
good.
The 2014 Lok Sabha poll
is still an open book, media hype
notwithstanding.
He who seals alliances
wins the race
(The author is National
Editor of Lokmat
group of newspapers at