by Harish Gupta, National Editor, Lokmat Group
Modi’s speech reminds the tragic
Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 65-minute speech from the
ramparts of Red Fort on Independence Day last week will be remembered, if at
all, for the jolt it gave to the political class. Many of its members had
assumed that, despite his being a rather crotchety guy, he's in the arena of
politics after all and therefore it'd soon become 'business as usual'. Modi's
speech and his style said it would not be so.
The Prime Minister's distinctive approach to his role
vis-a-vis his countrymen was evident from the beginning. The bullet-proof glass
box that his successive predecessors had used to speak from was done away with.
It was a touching act of faith, a bold way of telling the immediate audience as
well as tele-viewers that he'd not let security come between him and the
people. But even more distinctive was the fact that the speech was impromptu, a
departure from goodness knows how many years' tradition.
As the words welled up from his heart, the arms naturally
flailed, the head rotated to keep pace with thought, and, free from the
structure that speech-writers at the PMO impose on such ceremonial occasions,
making them anemic, his words were like a conversation by the fireside,
crackling with earthy humour and a lot of plainspokenness. He broke the mould
successfully. While brilliantly turning a reference to Mahatma Gandhi into a
promise to build toilets for girls in every school, he said in an aside if his
audience was wondering "why the Prime Minister is talking about toilets on
such a solemn occasion"!
However, conventional politicians cannot but be worried
by his candour, laced with aggression and contempt. He ridiculed the mindset of
the populace that is apparently worried about women's security but doesn't give
much thought to their "sons" who have become depraved and molesting
women. He pointed at the bitter infighting that marked the Central Government
before him, "with one department taking another to the Supreme
Court". He said "I am an outsider, but the last two months have given
me an insider view of the parallel governments here". He took a dig at the
pampered bureaucracy that thinks it is doing a favour by coming to work on
time. He asked MPs and MLAs to use their MPLAD funds to create model villages
which can serve as role model to the neighbouring areas. He was quick, and
least apologetic, in announcing a dramatic break from the past-the imminent
closure of the 64-year-old Planning Commission. He called the Soviet-style
behemoth "a very old" system that would cost much less to replace
than rejuvenate".
The subtext of sarcasm in the remark could not have been
lost on the fans of Jawaharlal Nehru, the first Prime Minister and founder of
the Commission, amidst the crowd. When he lamented the mess all around, with
the people falling behind in realising their true potential, his complaint was
not directed at any individual, or party, but was overarching. "When given
a task, people first ask: what's in it for me? If there's nothing for him (and
everything for the nation), he'll fret: why should I be in it then?"
It will be a mistake to think that Modi is just another
cynical man, like any other public intellectual in Lutyen's Delhi , who is ready with the problem if you
give him a solution. He's clearly thinking of welfare in a different way from
UPA's trademark doles to the poor. Modi promised a whopping financial inclusion
plan, Jan Dhan Yojana, which provides insurance cover of one lakh rupees to
millions of poor persons. The additional gain from it is that it opens up an
opportunity to bring a rich slice of India 's 50-crore unbanked
population into the ambit of banking service. This is the first step for
switching over from the inefficient and corruption-ridden Public Distribution
System of welfare benefits to Direct Cash Transfer-a long-standing refrain in
the reformist literature.
How can cash be directly transferred until the
beneficiary gets a bank account? The next focus of his agenda is on skills
development, which again is linked to his emphasis on manufacturing. It is in
this context that his appeal to manufacturers-"Make in India "-may
become a controversial catchword. How does one propose to 'make' anything in
India as long as its work-force remains skill-poor, its labour laws continue to
be antiquated, its infrastructure rotten, and the cost of finance stays steep.
But instead of quibbling over what comes first, chicken or egg, Modi has gone
one step ahead in reminding investors, foreign and domestic, that they must
respond to his cleaning-up efforts.
Modi’s speech reminds the tragic
last Mughal, Bahadur Shah Zafar,
sent in exile, never to return.
Similarly, his promise of a high-speed digital backbone
was both an assurance and a reminder. An extensive network of optical fibre
highways can trigger a revolution in IT-enabled services for both domestic use
and export and be the harbinger to a second wave of IT revolution. It can
create millions of new white collar jobs and give a new fillip to India 's
export earnings in the IT and ITES sector.
However, yet another crucial issue hings on the digital
super-highway. It is of the much discussed Goods and services Tax, which alone
can make the distribution of revenues between the Center and the states
equitable and transparent. In order words, GST is the fiscal passport to
federalism, the absence of which is complained about by all state leaders.
After Independence ,
Nehru chose the ramparts of Red Fort as the venue for 15 August speech by prime
minister with a remarkable sense of history. The red sandstone building
symbolished the pre-British India
of the Mughals. But Modi's unorthodox and candid worlds put India 's records
of the past 67 years in a light which is both quizzical and ironic. It drew a
bitter parallel between the previous speakers from the rampart, and the tragic
last Mughal, Bahadur Shah Zafar, whose effete reign ended in 1857 before he was dethroned and set in exile,
never to return.
The Author is
national editor of
Lokmat Group