by Harish Gupta, National Editor, Lokmat Group
The mere possibility of his getting close to the stake has already set the cat among the pigeons of Chanakyapuri (the diplomatic enclave in the capital). Nancy Powell, the former US ambassador, was the first to be seen as storm signal as she took her retirement in a hurry and for no apparent reason, except that just before quitting her job she had a long meeting with Modi in which he was reportedly far from demure in expressing his feelings about America's attitude to India, including the ill treatment of Devyani Khobragade, an Indian envoy to the US. It is not known if Modi gave vent to his pent-up anger for being denied the American visa from as early as 2005, and for an impression shared by many in Delhi that there was a clique of anti-Modi Indian and American bureaucrats, of which Powell could be a member.
In a series of interviews given to the language TV channels (none to the news traders of the English TV channels) Modi initially dodged his policy towards theUSA
when asked if visa will be an issue. His reply to ANI was diplomatic, "A
country does not work according to a preference of a certain individual. What
happened with Modi does not affect the policies of the country. India 's policy
should be according to its traditions. It should be according to the legacy
left behind by Atal Bihari Vajpayee. A country does not run if we keep on
bickering over past sayings. It is run while looking at the future. Therefore
whatever is in interest of India
then that should be done."
But in the midst of the applause at the India TV popular show "Aap Ki Adalat" which went unreported, Modi gave a clue of his mind. When asked if he would visit theUSA
if Americans give visa to him, Modi took a deep breath and articulated his
views as under: I will say what I said in 2005 when the visa was first denied
to me. I had said then that I will make my country so powerful that the
Americans will make a beeline for VISA to India ."
The two interviews were given one after the other. But left Modi watchers baffled. He gave no clue as to what he will do except doing business, trade, commerce and bargain for high technology which theUSA
has denied to India
so far. There is a possibility that he may use the visa issue to bargain with
the USA .
Its not without significance that ambassadors and diplomatic representatives of
45 countries were present to hear Modi at his first political rally in Delhi after he was
declared BJP's prime ministerial candidate last year. If this was unusual so
was the manner in which the USA
made Powell quit.
However, the Americans seemed typically flatfooted compared with their nimbler cousins across theAtlantic . British High
Commissioner Sir James Bevan was among the first to meet Modi in 2012 with the
pleasant tiding that Westminster had withdrawn
its 10-year diplomatic boycott of the controversial Indian politician due to
the 2002 Gujarat riots. On the other hand,
Joao Cravinho, Sir James' EU counterpart, was effusive about Modi, calling him
"a person of great prominence" and saying EU respected "the
judicial verdict that gave him a clean chit" for the 2002 communal carnage
in Gujarat.
Besides, it seems that there is little fact to support the fear, usually generated by Modi's local critics, that his alleged bull-headedness might spell trouble inIndia 's
immediate neighborhood. Pakistan ,
supposedly a country that defines its national identity by its enmity with India , however,
is unusually quiet about the rise of Modi. Sartaz Aziz , Pakistan 's
acting Foreign Minister, has recently been quoted by The Telegraph of London
that "the last time we had a breakthrough in our relationship
(Indo-Pakistan) was…with a BJP government. Mr. Vajpayee was from the BJP".
China
is also maintaining an expectant silence. Modi's recent fulmination against China for border transgression at an election
rally in Arunachal Pradesh, which China
claims to be a part of Tibet ,
drew little retaliatory flak from Beijing ,
showing that the Chinese foreign ministry is mature enough to distinguish
between electoral rhetoric and policy statements.
IfChina is at all staying
alert about the outcome of the elections south of the Himalayas, and keeping a
watchful eye on Modi, it is not because he is an unknown entity in China . He has
visited the country thrice and Chinese businessmen are now a permanent fixture
at the Vibrant Gujarat investment jamboree. However, China may be observing how
the famously warm relations between Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe and Modi plays out if
Modi takes charge in Delhi. For China
and Japan
have territorial issues, not to speak of competing egos. It is reported that a
new tranche of Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) loan signed last
month, which will fund extension of the third phase of Mass Rapid Transit
service in the National Capital Region, when materialized, can mark the
beginning of a long narrative of close Indo-Japan ties, if Modi and Abe are at
the helms of the two governments.
China is watchful but not apprehensive
because it has understood that Modi is a strong leader, and when it wants to do
business with another country, it is the primary requirement of that country’s
leader to be strong.
Delhi )
Of all the
aspirants for the prime minister's chair, it is certainly Narendra Modi who is
uppermost on the radar of foreign observers—from both far and near. If he
succeeds, there will certainly be a furious kerfuffle in the diplomatic
quarters around the world. For the world sees him as a leader with a
difference, not the type to accept the country's existing foreign policy
paradigm as business as usual. In diplomacy, as in life, change means risk.
The mere possibility of his getting close to the stake has already set the cat among the pigeons of Chanakyapuri (the diplomatic enclave in the capital). Nancy Powell, the former US ambassador, was the first to be seen as storm signal as she took her retirement in a hurry and for no apparent reason, except that just before quitting her job she had a long meeting with Modi in which he was reportedly far from demure in expressing his feelings about America's attitude to India, including the ill treatment of Devyani Khobragade, an Indian envoy to the US. It is not known if Modi gave vent to his pent-up anger for being denied the American visa from as early as 2005, and for an impression shared by many in Delhi that there was a clique of anti-Modi Indian and American bureaucrats, of which Powell could be a member.
In a series of interviews given to the language TV channels (none to the news traders of the English TV channels) Modi initially dodged his policy towards the
But in the midst of the applause at the India TV popular show "Aap Ki Adalat" which went unreported, Modi gave a clue of his mind. When asked if he would visit the
The two interviews were given one after the other. But left Modi watchers baffled. He gave no clue as to what he will do except doing business, trade, commerce and bargain for high technology which the
However, the Americans seemed typically flatfooted compared with their nimbler cousins across the
Besides, it seems that there is little fact to support the fear, usually generated by Modi's local critics, that his alleged bull-headedness might spell trouble in
If
Reportedly included in their to-do list are massive
Japanese infrastructure investments along the proposed dedicated railway
freight corridors linking the west coast with the east.
Modi wants
Amricans to make
beeline for Indian visa
Some Western commentators have begun to put Modi in the
league of strong world leaders, like Putin in Russia ,
or, to a lesser extent, China ’s
Xi Jinping. The world knows that if Modi becomes India ’s prime minister, it will be
through his determined effort. There is nothing accidental about it.
(The author is National
Editor of
Lokmat group of
newspapers
based in